Free Access
Issue
Fruits
Volume 66, Number 2, March-April 2011
Page(s) 109 - 119
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2011020
Published online 28 March 2011
  1. Shewfelt R.L., What is quality? Postharvest Biol. Technol. 15 (1999) 197–200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Infante R., Meneses P., Predieri S., Sensory quality performance of two nectarine flesh typologies exposed to distant market conditions, J. Food Qual. 31 (2008) 526–535. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Predieri S., Missere D., Gatti E., Buona come una pera – Analisi sensoriale per scoprire vizi e virtù di un frutto, in: Ravaioli A., Mazzotti V. (Eds.), Pere dell’Emilia-Romagna IGP, Qualità tipica vera e protetta, 2001, pp. 114–117. [Google Scholar]
  4. Di Natale C., Macagnano A., Martinelli E., Proietti E., Paolesse R., Castellari L., D’amico A., Electronic nose based investigation of the sensorial properties of peaches and nectarines, Sens. Actuators B 77 (2001) 561–566. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sohn J.H., Smith R., Yoong E., Leis J, Galvin G., Quantification of odours from piggery effluent ponds using an electronic nose and a artificial neural network, Biosyst. Eng. 86 (2003) 399–410. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ayala-Zavala J.F., Wang S.Y., Wang C.Y, González-Aguilar G.A., Effect of storage temperaturas on antioxidant capacity and aroma compounds in strawberry fruits, Lebensm.-Wiss.Technol. 37 (2004) 687–695. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bonghi C., Ramina A., Ruperti B., Vidrih R., Tonutti P., Peach fruit ripening and quality in relation to picking time, and hipoxic and high CO2 short-term postharvest treatments, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 16 (1999) 213–222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sinesio F., Di Natale C., Quaglia G., Bucarelli F., Moneta E., Macagnano A., Paolesse R., D’amico A., Use of electronic nose and trained sensory panel in the evaluation of tomato quality, J. Sci. Food Agric. 80 (2000) 63–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hernández Gómez A., Hu G., Wang J., García Pereira A., Evaluation of tomato maturity by electronic nose, Comput. Electron. Agric. 56 (2006) 44–52. [Google Scholar]
  10. Infante R., Farcuh M., Meneses C., Monitoring the sensorial quality and aroma through an electronic nose in peaches during cold storage, J. Sci. Food Agric. (2008) 2073–2078. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang H., Chang M., Wang J., Ye S., Evaluation of peach quality indices using an electronic nose by MLR, QPST and BP network, Sens. Actuators B 134 (2008) 332–338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang H., Wang J., Ye S., Prediction of acidity, soluble solids content and firmness of pear using electronic nose technique, J. Food Eng. 86 (2008) 370–378. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. McGuire R., Reporting for objective color measurements, HortScience 27 (1992) 1254–1255. [Google Scholar]
  14. Esposto S., Montedoro G., Selvaggini R., Riccò I., Taticchi A., Urbani S., Servili M., Monitoring of virgin olive oil volatile compounds evolution during olive malaxation by an array of metal oxide sensors, Food Chem. 113 (2009) 345–350. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Di Rienzo J.A., Casanoves F., Balzarini M.G., González L., Tablada M., Robledo C.W., InfoStat versión 2008, Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Univ. Nac. Córdoba, Argentina, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  16. Balzarini M.G., González L., Tablada M., Casanoves F., Di Rienzo J.A, Robledo C.W., Manual del usuario, Editor. Brujas, Argentina, 2008, pp. 182–188. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pardo A., Ruiz M.A., SPSS11: Guía para el análisis de datos, Mc Graw Hill., Madrid, Spain, 2002, pp. 363–379. [Google Scholar]
  18. Crisosto C., How do we increase peach consumption? Acta Hortic. 592 (2002) 601–605. [Google Scholar]
  19. Crisosto C., Crisosto G., Bowerman E., Understanding consumer acceptance of peach, nectarine, and plum cultivars, Acta Hortic. 604 (2003) 115–119. [Google Scholar]
  20. Crisosto C., Crisosto G., Echeverría G., Puy J., Segregation of peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] cultivars according to their organoleptic characteristics, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 39 (2006) 10–18. [Google Scholar]
  21. Moriguchi T., Ishizawa Y., Sanada T., Differences in sugar composition in Prunus persica fruit and the classification by the principal component analysis, J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 59 (1990) 307–312. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Robertson J.A., Horvat R.J., Lyon B.G., Meredith F.I., Senter S.D., Okie W.R., Comparison of quality characteristics of selected yellow- and white-fleshed peach cultivars, J. Food Sci. 55 (1990) 1308–1311. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fillon L., Kilcast D., Consumer perception of crispness and crunchiness in fruits and vegetables, Food Qual. Pref. 13 (2002) 23–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Neri F., Pratella G.C., Brigati S., Gli indici di maturazione per ottimizzare la qualità organolettica della fruta, Frutticoltura 5 (2003) 20–29. [Google Scholar]
  25. Testoni A., Grassi B., Grassi M., Lovati F., Evoluzione della maturazione in pesche e nettarine in funzione della durata e del metodo di conservazione, Atti III Giornate SOI, 10–14 March 1996, Erice, Italy, 1996, pp. 369–370. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bellini E., Peach genetic improvement: “María Dolce”, new nectarine with organoleptic value, Acta Hortic. 374 (1996) 39–41. [Google Scholar]
  27. Crisosto C., Crisosto G., Relationship between ripe soluble solids concentration (RSSC) and consumer acceptance of high and low acid meeting flesh peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] cultivars, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 38 (2005) 239–246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Moreau-Rio M., Scandella D., Vénien S., Pêches et nectarines. Image et perception de la qualité, analyse sensorielle, Infos-Ctifl 108 (1995) 12–17. [Google Scholar]
  29. Benedetti S., Buratti S., Spinardi A., Mannino S., Mignani I., Electronic nose as a non-destructive tool to characterise peach cultivars and to monitor their ripening stage during shelf-life, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 47 (2008) 181–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Visai C., Vanoli M., Volatile compound production during growth and ripening of peaches and nectarines, Scientia Hortic. 70 (1997) 15–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Saevels S., Lammertyn J., Berna A., Veraverbeke E., Di Natale C., Nicolai B., Electronic nose as a non-destructive tool to evaluate the optimal harvest date of apples, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 30 (2003) 3–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Cavicchi, L., Profilo qualitativo sensoriale di alcune cultuvar di albicocco, in: Albicocco: Indicazioni varietali e techniche di produczione, Cent. Ric. Prod. Veg. (CRPV) 59, 2000, pp. 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  33. Moltó E., Selfa E., Ferriz J., Conesa E., Gutierrez A., An aroma sensor for assessing peach quality, J. Agric. Eng. Res. 72 (1999) 311–316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Di Natale C., Zude-Sasse M., Macagnano A., Paolesse R., Herold B., D’Amico A., Outer product analysis of electronic nose and visible spectra: Application to the measurement of peach fruit characteristics, Anal. Chim. Acta 459 (2002) 107–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Infante R., Gonzalez J., Early maturing peach embryo rescue and in vitro survival at different fruit growth stages, Acta Hortic. 592 (2002) 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hernández Gómez A., Wang J., Hu G, Gracía Pereira A., Discrimination of storage shelf-life for mandarin by electronic nose technique, Food Sci. Technol. 40 (2007) 681–689. [Google Scholar]
  37. Azondalou R., Darbellay C., Luisier J., Villettaz J., Amadò R., Development of a model for quality assessment of tomatoes an apricots, Swiss Soc. Food Sci. Technol. 36 (2003) 223–233. [Google Scholar]
  38. Parpinello G.P., Fabbri A., Domenichelli S., Mesisca V., Cavicchi L., Versari A., Discrimination of apricot cultivar by gas multisensor array using an artificial neural network, Biosyst. Eng. 97 (2007) 371–378. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Plutowska B., Wardencki W., Aromagrams-aromatic profiles in the appreciation of food quality, Food Chem. 101 (2007) 845–872. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Brovelli E.A., Brecht J.K., Sherman W.B., Sims C.A., Harrison J.M., Sensory and compositional attributes of melting- and nonmelting-flesh peaches for the fresh market, J. Sci. Food Agric. 79 (1999) 707–712. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Costell E., Expectativas del consumidor desde el punto de vista sensorial, Alimentos 13 (1988) 63–67. [Google Scholar]
  42. Giacalone G., Peano C., Iacona T., Iacona C., Consumer testing on local and new cultivars of peach in the Roero area, Piedmont, Italy, Acta Hortic. 713 (2006) 457–460. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jordan J., Shewfelt R., Garner J., Variyam J., Estimating the value of internal quality aspects to consumers, Acta Hortic. 259 (1990) 139–144. [Google Scholar]